Friday, August 28, 2009

Scary good

In his three preseason appearances, Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has posted the following passing statistics.

Game #1 (vs. Cleveland): 5-10, 102 passing yards, 1 TD, 119.6 QB rating
Game #2 (vs. Buffalo): 8-9, 98 passing yards, 2 TDs, 151.6 QB rating
Game #3 (vs. Arizona): 14-19, 258, 3 TDs, 155.2 QB rating

Count all that up. Rodgers has now completed 71 per cent of his passes for 458 yards and six touchdowns for a 142.1 quarterback rating. He also hasn’t thrown an interception, and at one point during the Arizona game, I read the Packers first team offence had scored seven touchdowns in nine possessions this preseason. That is very good.

The Packers went 6-10 last season in Rodgers' first year as a starter. But it wasn’t his fault. That was mostly on the defence. But now the Packers have brought in Dom Capers as defensive coordinator, they’ve switched to a 3-4 and the first team defence is actually giving teams mucho problems thus far.

The Packers defence might not be able to keep up that level of play throughout the regular season. However, they may not have to. As sharp as Rodgers looks right now, if the D can improve even slightly on what it did last year, the Packers will be very tough in 2009. (Note: Packers star wide receiver Greg Jennings did leave the Arizona game after a hard hit. If his injury is serious, that could alter things a bit for Green Bay.)

Anyway, the Vikings-Packers games – thanks to the Favre stuff and the play of Rodgers – should be the most hotly contested, entertaining games in the history of this rivalry. And we know every Vikings-Packers game is hotly contested, and with a few exceptions, always entertaining. It might even be the best rivalry in North American professional sports.

I can’t wait for those two games.

The Metrodome
KSTP reports that the Metrodome will undergo some cosmetic changes to make the place look more like a Vikings-only stadium now that the Gophers and Twins won’t be playing there anymore come October.

Is it too much to hope that this might be a sign Vikings owner Zygi Wilf is willing to look at ways of renovating the Metrodome to open up more revenue streams for him while he waits for the state to come around on the idea of partially funding a new stadium for the team?

Maybe 2011 – the year the Vikings lease at the Metrodome expires – isn’t going to be the year Wilf moves the team elsewhere. Maybe he will sign a lease extension, one long enough that he can anticipate the economy and the political climate improving to the point where state politicians will be more willing to consider his stadium proposal.

Late addition
The National Football Post's Matt Bowen writes about what he's seen in the preseason games he's watched this week. He's high on the Packers and he makes some nice observations about some other teams and players as well.

8 comments:

SupaFan said...

And the Detroit Loins went 4-0 in the preseason last year.

DC said...

Ha, ha – the Detroit "Loins." I love it.

On a serious note. Rodgers was very good last year, so I think it's reasonable to conclude what we're seeing this preseason is real from him. As for the Packers improved D, the talent they have hasn't changed much from last year, but I think the 3-4 might throw some teams off early on and the Vikes do play the Pack in game four. But the Vikes will have played two teams that use the 3-4 in preseason, plus the Browns in the opener, so they may be ready for it by then.

Travis D. said...

The Packers have a nice, young team with a lot of pieces in place. I'm actually very envious.

I would not be surprised to see them play very well this year.

This may sound sacrilegious, but I have a good deal of respect for the Packers organization... and would like to make it to Lambeau someday to watch a game.

I also wish to see AD run for 200 yards against them in both games this year, with the Vikings completely crushing them in the sure to be super-bowl like atmosphere of those games.

joe km fischer said...

I definitely fear the Packer offense: it will be very, very good.

However, I discussed this with a Packer fan friend talking up Rodgers' preseason performance. I think Rodgers is exactly the sort of player that can dominate in preseason games against bland defense. He's a systematic, accurate passer that makes smart reads. In preseason, that kind of QB will probably complete 75% of his passes. The Vikings really did smother Rodgers in the game last season at the Metrodome.

But as I said, Rodgers is very good, and the Packer offense is very good. I still think the Vikings, Bears, and Packers will win 10+.

DC said...

Travis:

The Vikes also have lots of pieces – many of them young, some not-so-much. What they don't have is young, Pro Bowl caliber quarterback like Rodgers.

Sigh.

PV:

As was really, really hoping Rodgers would be a total bust last year. Didn't happen. He probably is feasting on a bowl of vanilla offence so far but if he has improved, it's going to be tougher for the Vikes D to smother him like they did in the Metrodome last year. Expect a split against the Packers in two games that will be decided in the last three minutes.

I also expect the Vikes to win 10 games this year.

Jason said...

I'm not quite so high on the Bears. I think Cutler's overrated, and his receiving corps in Chicago is much worse than what he had in Denver. I'd predict 8-9 wins for the Bears, if I were in the prediction business.

Travis D. said...

I'm with Jason.

I'm looking for the Vikings and the Pack to duke it out this year... with the Bears and Lions on the outside looking in.

Unfortunately, in two seasons, I expect the Pack to be crushing the NFC North and pushing the best in the NFC for a Super Bowl.

DC said...

Travis:

The Pack have some nice young talent but they have some key guys that are also long in the tooth.

Woodson's 33 and soon to be 34. Harris is 34 and soon to be 35. Kampman is 29 and soon to be 30. Driver is getting up there. So they've got some good players they are going to have to replace in a couple of years.

I don't see them dominating the division in a couple of years. It could happen. But it's just as likely the Vikes could or the Bears could depending on what team does the better job improving it's talent base.